Data collection and data wrangling
The ASTA team
Data
Data example
We use data about pengiuns from the R package palmerpenguins
pingviner <- palmerpenguins::penguins
pingviner
## # A tibble: 344 x 8
## species island bill_length_mm bill_depth_mm flipp… body… sex year
## <fctr> <fctr> <dbl> <dbl> <int> <int> <fct> <int>
## 1 Adelie Torgersen 39.1 18.7 181 3750 male 2007
## 2 Adelie Torgersen 39.5 17.4 186 3800 fema… 2007
## 3 Adelie Torgersen 40.3 18.0 195 3250 fema… 2007
## 4 Adelie Torgersen NA NA NA NA <NA> 2007
## 5 Adelie Torgersen 36.7 19.3 193 3450 fema… 2007
## 6 Adelie Torgersen 39.3 20.6 190 3650 male 2007
## 7 Adelie Torgersen 38.9 17.8 181 3625 fema… 2007
## 8 Adelie Torgersen 39.2 19.6 195 4675 male 2007
## 9 Adelie Torgersen 34.1 18.1 193 3475 <NA> 2007
## 10 Adelie Torgersen 42.0 20.2 190 4250 <NA> 2007
## # ... with 334 more rows
Summaries and plots of qualitative variables
Tables of qualitative variables
- The main function to make tables from a data frame of observations is
tally()
which tallies (counts up) the number of observations within a given category. E.g:
tally(~species, data = pingviner)
## species
## Adelie Chinstrap Gentoo
## 152 68 124
tally(species ~ island, data = pingviner)
## island
## species Biscoe Dream Torgersen
## Adelie 44 56 52
## Chinstrap 0 68 0
## Gentoo 124 0 0
Plots of qualitative variables
- The main plotting functions for qualitative variables are
gf_percents()
and gf_bar()
. E.g:
gf_percents(~species, data = pingviner)
gf_percents(~species, fill = ~sex, data = pingviner)
gf_percents(~species, fill = ~sex, data = pingviner, position = position_dodge())
Target population and random sampling
Population parameters
- When the sample size grows, then e.g. the mean of the sample, \(\overline{y}\), will stabilize around a fixed value, \(\mu\), which is usually unknown. The value \(\mu\) is called the population mean.
- Correspondingly, the standard deviation of the sample, \(s\), will stabilize around a fixed value, \(\sigma\), which is usually unknown. The value \(\sigma\) is called the population standard deviation.
- Notation:
- \(\mu\) (mu) denotes the population mean.
- \(\sigma\) (sigma) denotes the population standard deviation.
\(\mu\) |
\(\overline{y}\) |
\(\sigma\) |
\(s\) |
A word about terminology
- Standard deviation: a measure of variability of a population or a sample.
- Standard error: a measure of variability of an estimate. For example, a measure of variability of the sample mean.
Aim of statistics
- Statistics is all about “saying something” about a population.
- Typically, this is done by taking a random sample from the population.
- The sample is then analysed and a statement about the population can be made.
- The process of making conclusions about a population from analysing a sample is called statistical inference.
Random sampling schemes
Possible strategies for obtaining a random sample from the target population are explained in Agresti section 2.4:
- Simple sampling: each possible sample of equal size equally probable
- Systematic sampling
- Stratified sampling
- Cluster sampling
- Multistage sampling
- …
Biases
Types of biases
Agresti section 2.3:
- Sampling/selection bias
- Probability sampling: each sample of size \(n\) has same probability of being sampled
- Still problems: undercoverage, groups not represented (inmates, homeless, hospitalized, …)
- Non-probability sampling: probability of sample not possible to determine
- Response bias
- E.g. poorly worded, confusing or even order of questions
- Lying if think socially unacceptable
- Non-response bias
- Non-response rate high; systematic in non-responses (age, health, believes)
Example of sample bias: United States presidential election, 1936
(Based on Agresti, this and this.)
- Current president: Franklin D. Roosevelt
- Election: Franklin D. Roosevelt vs Alfred Landon (Republican governor of Kansas)
- Literary Digest: magazine with history of accurately predicting winner of past 5 presidential elections
Results
- Literary Digest poll: Landon: 57%; Roosevelt: 43%
- Actual results: Landon: 38%; Roosevelt: 62%
- Sampling error: 57%-38% = 19%
- Practically all of the sampling error was the result of sample bias
- Poll size of > 2 mio. individuals participated – extremely large poll
Problems (biases)
- Mailing list of about 10 mio. names was created
- Based on every telephone directory, lists of magasine subscribers, rosters of clubs and associations, and other sources
- Each one of 10 mio. received a mock ballot and asked to return the marked ballot to the magazine
- “respondents who returned their questionnaires represented only that subset of the population with a relatively intense interest in the subject at hand, and as such constitute in no sense a random sample … it seems clear that the minority of anti-Roosevelt voters felt more strongly about the election than did the pro-Roosevelt majority” (The American Statistician, 1976)
- Biases:
- Sample bias
- List generated towards middle- and upper-class voters (e.g. 1936 and telephones)
- Many unemployed (club memberships and magazine subscribers)
- Non-response bias
- Only responses from 2.3/2.4 mio out of 10 million people
Example of response bias: Wording matters
New York Times/CBS News poll on attitude to increased fuel taxes
- “Are you in favour of a new gasoline tax?” - 12% said yes.
- “Are you in favour of a new gasoline tax to decrease US dependency on foreign oil?” - 55% said yes.
- “Do you think a new gas tax would help to reduce global warming?” - 59% said yes.
Example of response bias: Order of questions matter
US study during cold war asked two questions:
1 “Do you think that US should let Russian newspaper reporters come here and sent back whatever they want?”
2 “Do you think that Russia should let American newspaper reporters come in and sent back whatever they want?”
The percentage of yes to question 1 was 36%, if it was asked first and 73%, when it was asked last.
Example of survivior bias: Bullet holes of honor
(Based on this.)
- World War II
- Royal Air Force (RAF), UK
- Lost many planes to German anti-aircraft fire
- Armor up!
- Where?
- Count up all the bullet holes in planes that returned from missions
- Put extra armor in the areas that attracted the most fire
- Hungarian-born mathematician Abraham Wald:
- If a plane makes it back safely with a bunch of bullet holes in its wings: holes in the wings aren’t very dangerous
- Armor up the areas that (on average) don’t have any bullet holes
- They never make it back, apparently dangerous
Engine |
\(1.11\) |
Fuselage |
\(1.73\) |
Fuel system |
\(1.55\) |
Rest of the plane |
\(1.80\) |
(See also this xkcd)